Popular Articles

The party of former Ukrainian premier Yulia...

The party of former Ukrainian premier Yulia Tymoshenko may be forced to attack its opponents during a debate on the ratification of a deal to extend the lease of a Russian naval base, a lawmaker said on Monday.


Dynamo Moscow insisted on Tuesday that Liverpool...

Dynamo Moscow insisted on Tuesday that Liverpool attacking midfielder Yossi Benayoun was still a transfer target.


Trains on the Sokolnicheskaya line of the...

Trains on the Sokolnicheskaya line of the Moscow subway, the site of two deadly suicide bombings on Monday morning, are running as normal, the subway"s press service said.

Arts & Entertainment

The United States" decision to deploy a...

Russia"s response was predictable: it demanded an explanation from the U.S. It wanted to know what kind of ground facilities Washington planned to deploy in Romania. The U.S. intention to send Aegis-equipped ships with SM-3 missiles into the Black Sea also caught Russia"s attention.

Russia"s Deputy Prime Minister Sergei Ivanov told the Munich Security Conference that Romania was a signatory to the 1936 Montreux Treaty, which imposes strict limits on the presence of outside powers in the Black Sea.

On the other hand, Russia"s reaction to placing an anti-missile shield in Romania was milder than when the U.S. planned to deploy GBI interceptor missiles in Poland and a radar tracking station in the Czech Republic. This is understandable: a system using SM-3 block I or block II missiles will pose no threat to Russian nuclear forces, just as the earlier planned base in Poland equipped with the same missiles.

In fact, this facility, planned for deployment by 2015, is

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 


Add your comment:
Name:
Site address: http://
Your message:
Enter today\\\\'s date, 2 digits
(spam protection):